| Résumé | Road tunnels are enclosed spaces that most occupants only experience while driving through them. In case of fire, however, occupants potentially need to evacuate on foot from a dangerous and unfamiliar environment. Clear and accurate guidance is important for an efficient and safe evacuation from tunnels. Common cues for evacuation guidance are a signage and audio messages that attract occupants to move on appropriate egress routes and avoid unsafe routes. This paper investigates how different types of visual and auditory signals influence occupants’ exit choices in a simulated tunnel evacuation. Common guidance cues were presented to participants in a mobile Head Mounted Display, and they were asked to choose between two possible exit doors in a simulated road tunnel. Two attracting cues (“EXIT” signs, audio instructions), and two detracting cues (“DO NOT ENTER” signs; traffic cones placed in front of an exit) were studied in three virtual reality (VR) experiments. In each experiment, the presence and direction of the cues were manipulated, and data from 20 participants were collected. Experiment 1 explored the effects of attracting cues, Experiment 2 detracting cues, and Experiment 3 the combination of attracting and detracting cues. Across all studies, participants tended to follow the guidance provided when there was only one cue. When several competing and even contradictory cues were present, participants were most likely to rely on audio instructions, followed by traffic cones and “DO NOT ENTER” signs, whereas “EXIT” signs were often disregarded. We conclude that participants tend to follow temporary cues that could carry current information, as opposed to permanently installed signage. Some corresponding suggestions are put forward on evacuation system design and strategic planning in a tunnel fire. |
|---|
