DOI | Resolve DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/58/1A/06010 |
---|
Author | Search for: Broda, R.ORCID identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6453-9716; Search for: Bonková, I.; Search for: Capogni, M.; Search for: Carconi, P.; Search for: Cassette, P.; Search for: Coulon, R.; Search for: Courte, S.; Search for: Felice, P. De; Search for: Dziel, T.; Search for: Fazio, A.; Search for: Frechou, C.; Search for: Galea, R1; Search for: García-Toraño, E.; Search for: Kołakowska, E.; Search for: Kossert, K.; Search for: Krivošík, M.; Search for: Lech, E.; Search for: Lee, K. B.; Search for: Liang, J.; Search for: Listkowska, A.; Search for: Liu, H.; Search for: Navarro, N.; Search for: Nähle, O. J.; Search for: Nowicka, M.; Search for: Rooy, M. Van; Search for: Sabot, B.; Search for: Saganowski, P.; Search for: Sato, Y.; Search for: Tymiński, Z.; Search for: Yunoki, A.; Search for: Zhang, M.; Search for: Ziemek, T. |
---|
Affiliation | - National Research Council of Canada. Metrology Research Centre
|
---|
Format | Text, Article |
---|
Abstract | A comparison of the activity concentration of an ⁵⁵Fe solution was organized by the POLATOM under the auspices of the CCRI(II). The solution was sent to thirteen laboratories; ready-to-measure sources were also prepared using the same ⁵⁵Fe solution in diffusive (polyethylene) vials and sent to twelve laboratories. Twelve measurement reports were received. The results, as well as relevant information on the measurement techniques, are presented and analysed in this paper. The differences in the results obtained from measurements in non-diffusive (glass) and diffusive vials are indicated. |
---|
Publication date | 2021-04-30 |
---|
Publisher | IOP |
---|
In | |
---|
Language | English |
---|
Peer reviewed | Yes |
---|
Export citation | Export as RIS |
---|
Report a correction | Report a correction (opens in a new tab) |
---|
Record identifier | d965a391-4d06-46ed-9a15-8926f6971156 |
---|
Record created | 2023-01-16 |
---|
Record modified | 2023-01-16 |
---|