| Download | - View accepted manuscript: A Comparison of Pseudo-Paper and Paper Prototyping Methods for Mobile Evaluations (PDF, 310 KB)
|
|---|
| Author | Search for: Lumsden, Joanna; Search for: MacLean, R. |
|---|
| Format | Text, Article |
|---|
| Proceedings title | The International Workshop on Mobile and Networking Technologies for Social Applications (MONET'2008) [Proceedings] |
|---|
| Conference | The International Workshop on Mobile and Networking Technologies for Social Applications (MONET'2008),part of the LNCS OnTheMove (OTM) Federated Conferences andWorkshops, November 4, 2008, Monterrey, Mexico |
|---|
| Subject | mobile technology; technologie mobile; paper prototyping; prototypes papier; mobile lab-based usability evaluations; évaluations en laboratoire de l'utilisabilité de technologies mobiles |
|---|
| Abstract | The research presented in this paper is part of an ongoing investigation into how best to support meaningful lab-based usability evaluations of mobile technologies. In particular, we report on a comparative study of (a) a standard paper prototype of a mobile application used to perform an early-phase seated (static) usability evaluation, and (b) a pseudo-paper prototype created from the paper prototype used to perform an early-phase, contextually-relevant, mobile usability evaluation. We draw some initial conclusions regarding whether it is worth the added effort of conducting a usability evaluation of a pseudo-paper prototype in a contextually-relevant setting during early-phase user interface development. |
|---|
| Publication date | 2008 |
|---|
| Language | English |
|---|
| NRC number | NRCC 50705 |
|---|
| NPARC number | 8913903 |
|---|
| Export citation | Export as RIS |
|---|
| Report a correction | Report a correction |
|---|
| Record identifier | cdae9602-2a7c-4ccd-b14c-9925b799c6cb |
|---|
| Record created | 2009-04-22 |
|---|
| Record modified | 2020-08-12 |
|---|
