Language selection

Government of Canada / Gouvernement du Canada

Search

Correlation between a laboratory impact-abrasion test and an in-situ marked-ball test

From National Research Council Canada

DOIResolve DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-679X(90)90006-B
AuthorSearch for: ; Search for: 1; Search for: 1
Affiliation
  1. National Research Council of Canada
FormatText, Article
Subjectimpact-abrasion tests; wear; grinding; mill balls
Abstract
In ball milling, materials consumption by wear represents a very high production cost, and must be minimized by the proper selection of materials, especially those for balls. A simple laboratory impact-abrasion test was compared with the abrasion caused by ball mill grinding to develop a method of evaluating ferrous alloys for grinding applications. A marked balls test has been used for direct assessment of wear. For different chromium white cast irons, a good correlation was found between the relative abrasion resistance determined in the laboratory tests and in actual field tests. The laboratory test method is described in the present paper, as well as the results obtained with these experimental grade of high chromium cast irons.
Publication date
PublisherElsevier
In
  • Tribology International 23, no. 5: 329–332.
LanguageEnglish
Peer reviewedYes
NRC numberNRCC 30338
NRC-IGM89TC-204-890-G
Export citationExport as RIS
Report a correctionReport a correction (opens in a new tab)
Record identifierc4e0f975-1d01-4f4f-9592-9f185a32e2ac
Record created2020-04-08
Record modified2020-05-08
Date modified: