Characterization of emissions from the use of alternative aviation fuels

From National Research Council Canada

DOIResolve DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2015-42122
AuthorSearch for: ; Search for: 1; Search for: 1; Search for: ; Search for: 1
Name affiliation
  1. National Research Council Canada. Aerospace
FormatText
TypeArticle
Proceedings titleProceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
ConferenceASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2015, 15 June 2015 through 19 June 2015
ISBN9780791856680
9780791856680
Volume4A
SubjectBlending; Carbon; Fuels; Gas turbines; Kerosene; Sustainable development; Synthetic fuels; Turbines; Characterization tests; Chemical compositions; Environmental sustainability; Hydrogen contents; Hydrogen-to-carbon ratio; Overall properties; Particulate matter emissions; Primary propulsion; Alternative fuels
Abstract
Alternative fuels for aviation are now a reality. These fuels not only reduce reliance on conventional petroleum-based fuels as the primary propulsion source, but also offer promise for environmental sustainability. While these alternative fuels meet the aviation fuels standards and their overall properties resemble those of the conventional fuel, they are expected to demonstrate different exhaust emissions characteristics because of the inherent variations in their chemical composition resulting from the variations involved in the processing of these fuels. This paper presents the results of back-to-back comparison of emissions characterization tests that were performed using three alternative aviation fuels in a GE CF-700-2D-2 engine core. The fuels used were an unblended synthetic kerosene fuel with aromatics (SKA), an unblended Fischer Tropsch synthetic paraffinic kerosene (SPK) and a semi-synthetic 50-50 blend of Jet A-1 and hydroprocessed SPK. Results indicate that while there is little dissimilarity in the gaseous emissions profiles from these alternative fuels, there is however a significant difference in the particulate matter emissions from these fuels. These differences are primarily attributed to the variations in the aromatic and hydrogen contents in the fuels with some contributions from the hydrogen-to-carbon ratio of the fuels.
Publication date
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers
LanguageEnglish
Peer reviewedYes
NPARC number21277370
Export citationExport as RIS
Report a correctionReport a correction
Record identifiera6e02e05-434f-4222-b4ff-aaf35e63706b
Record created2016-03-09
Record modified2016-05-09
Report a problem on this page
Date modified: