| Download | - View accepted manuscript: Single-plane versus three-plane methods for relative range error evaluation of medium-range 3D imaging systems (PDF, 1.9 MiB)
|
|---|
| DOI | Resolve DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2179591 |
|---|
| Author | Search for: MacKinnon, David K.1; Search for: Cournoyer, Luc1; Search for: Beraldin, J.-Angelo1 |
|---|
| Affiliation | - National Research Council of Canada. Measurement Science and Standards
|
|---|
| Format | Text, Article |
|---|
| Subject | relative range error; 3D imaging system; lidar; performance assessment; medium-range optical non-contact 3D imaging system; terrestrial laser scanners; ASTM E57 standards development |
|---|
| Abstract | Within the context of the ASTM E57 working group WK12373, we compare the two methods that had been initially proposed for calculating the relative range error of medium-range (2 m to 150 m) optical non-contact 3D imaging systems: the first is based on a single plane (single-plane assembly) and the second on an assembly of three mutually non-orthogonal planes (three-plane assembly). Both methods are evaluated for their utility in generating a metric to quantify the relative range error of medium-range optical non-contact 3D imaging systems. We conclude that the three plane assembly is comparable to the single-plane assembly with regard to quantification of relative range error while eliminating the requirement to isolate the edges of the target plate face. |
|---|
| Publication date | 2015-06-21 |
|---|
| In | |
|---|
| Series | |
|---|
| Language | English |
|---|
| Peer reviewed | Yes |
|---|
| NPARC number | 21275068 |
|---|
| Export citation | Export as RIS |
|---|
| Report a correction | Report a correction (opens in a new tab) |
|---|
| Record identifier | 934d6a08-420c-4218-ab84-4d099c6af218 |
|---|
| Record created | 2015-05-06 |
|---|
| Record modified | 2020-06-04 |
|---|
