DOI | Resolve DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010 |
---|
Author | Search for: Duan, Yuxia; Search for: Zhang, Hai; Search for: Maldague, Xavier P.V.; Search for: Ibarra-Castanedo, Clemente; Search for: Servais, Pierre; Search for: Genest, Marc1; Search for: Sfarra, Stefano; Search for: Meng, Jianqiao |
---|
Affiliation | - National Research Council of Canada. Aerospace
|
---|
Format | Text, Article |
---|
Subject | thermography; ultrasonic testing; CFRP; impact damage; probability of detection |
---|
Abstract | In order to quantitatively compare the reliability of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing techniques, a set of thirty-five Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) composite panels with impact damages are inspected by pulsed thermography and ultrasonic C-scan. The comparative experimental results and Probability of Detection (PoD) analysis results are presented. The quantitative comparison shows that pulsed thermography testing has smaller defect size at 90% PoD with 95% confidence level, i.e. a90/95 values than ultrasonic testing for the parameters and setup used in the inspections of these thirty-five CFRP composite panels. |
---|
Publication date | 2018-11-20 |
---|
Publisher | Elsevier |
---|
In | |
---|
Language | English |
---|
Peer reviewed | Yes |
---|
Export citation | Export as RIS |
---|
Report a correction | Report a correction (opens in a new tab) |
---|
Record identifier | 783b2bb3-60e8-430b-8178-a65703cd5881 |
---|
Record created | 2019-06-07 |
---|
Record modified | 2020-03-16 |
---|