| DOI | Resolve DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.820500 |
|---|
| Author | Search for: Stuart, Geoffrey W.; Search for: Jennings, Sion A.1; Search for: Kalich, Melvyn E.; Search for: Rash, Clarence E.; Search for: Harding, Thomas H.; Search for: Craigb, Gregory L.1 |
|---|
| Affiliation | - National Research Council of Canada. NRC Institute for Aerospace Research
|
|---|
| Format | Text, Article |
|---|
| Conference | SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing, April 13-17, 2009, Orlando, FL, USA |
|---|
| Subject | night vision devices; hyperstereopsis; adaptation |
|---|
| Abstract | Modern helmet-mounted night vision devices, such as the Thales TopOwlTM helmet, project imagery from intensifiers mounted on the sides of the helmet onto the helmet visor. This increased effective inter-ocular separation distorts several cues to depth and distance that are grouped under the term "hyperstereopsis". Stereoscopic depth perception, at near to moderate distances (several hundred metres), is subject to magnification of binocular disparities. Absolute distance perception at near distances (a few metres) is affected by increased "differential perspective" as well as an increased requirement for convergence of the eyes to achieve binocular fixation. These distortions result in visual illusions such as the "bowl effect" where the ground appears to rise up near the observer. Previous reports have indicated that pilots can adapt to these distortions after several hours of exposure. The present study was concerned with both the time course and the mechanisms involved in this adaptation. Three test pilots flew five sorties with a hyperstereo night vision device. Initially, pilots reported that they were compensating for the effects of hyperstereopsis, but on the third and subsequent sorties all reported perceptual adaptation, that is, a reduction in illusory perception. Given that this adaptation was the result of intermittent exposure, and did not produce visual aftereffects, it was not due to the recalibration of the relationship between binocular cues and depth/distance. A more likely explanation of the observed visual adaptation is that it results from a discounting of distorted binocular cues in favour of veridical monocular cues, such as familiar size, motion parallax and linear perspective. |
|---|
| Publication date | 2009-05-01 |
|---|
| Publisher | Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers |
|---|
| In | |
|---|
| Series | |
|---|
| Language | English |
|---|
| Peer reviewed | Yes |
|---|
| NPARC number | 23004905 |
|---|
| Export citation | Export as RIS |
|---|
| Report a correction | Report a correction (opens in a new tab) |
|---|
| Record identifier | 39e0b783-fd13-4135-92f9-cd43ebd50e1f |
|---|
| Record created | 2019-01-18 |
|---|
| Record modified | 2020-04-16 |
|---|
