Heart rate variability during exertional heat stress : effects of heat production and treatment

From National Research Council Canada

DOIResolve DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-013-2804-7
AuthorSearch for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for:
FormatText
TypeArticle
Journal titleEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
ISSN1439-6319
1439-6327
Volume114
Issue4
Pages785–792
SubjectExercise-induced hyperthermia; EHS; Heart rate variability; HRV; Core temperature; Hyperthermia
Abstract
Purpose We assessed the efficacy of different treatments (i.e., treatment with ice water immersion vs. natural recovery) and the effect of exercise intensities (i.e., low vs. high) for restoring heart rate variability (HRV) indices during recovery from exertional heat stress (EHS). Methods Nine healthy adults (26 ± 3 years, 174.2 ± 3.8 cm, 74.6 ± 4.3 kg, 17.9 ± 2.8 % body fat, 57 ± 2 mL·kg·−1 min−1 peak oxygen uptake) completed four EHS sessions incorporating either walking (4.0–4.5 km·h−1, 2 % incline) or jogging (~7.0 km·h−1, 2 % incline) on a treadmill in a hot-dry environment (40 °C, 20–30 % relative humidity) while wearing a non-permeable rain poncho for a slow or fast rate of rectal temperature (Tre) increase, respectively. Upon reaching a Tre of 39.5 °C, participants recovered until Tre returned to 38 °C either passively or with whole-body immersion in 2 °C water. A comprehensive panel of 93 HRV measures were computed from the time, frequency, time–frequency, scale-invariant, entropy and non-linear domains. Results Exertional heat stress significantly affected 60/93 HRV measures analysed. Analyses during recovery demonstrated that there were no significant differences between HRV measures that had been influenced by EHS at the end of passive recovery vs. whole-body cooling treatment (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, the cooling treatment required statistically significantly less time to reduce Tre (p less than 0.001). Conclusions While EHS has a marked effect on autonomic nervous system modulation and whole-body immersion in 2 °C water results in faster cooling, there were no observed differences in restoration of autonomic heart rate modulation as measured by HRV indices with whole-body cold-water immersion compared to passive recovery in thermoneutral conditions.
Publication date
PublisherSpringer
LanguageEnglish
Peer reviewedYes
NRC publication
This is a non-NRC publication

"Non-NRC publications" are publications authored by NRC employees prior to their employment by NRC.

NPARC number23001214
Export citationExport as RIS
Report a correctionReport a correction
Record identifier13de8cee-ce12-4c68-8848-6e33438105df
Record created2017-01-05
Record modified2020-02-06
Report a problem on this page
Date modified: